Dear Krisi,krisi wrote::D Honestly, this is comical. But it's their life we're out of this.
We're not out of this.
This is also our problem.
What would happen if 50 % of this world population got married to the same sex?
What a mess
Moderator: TalkingPoint
Dear Krisi,krisi wrote::D Honestly, this is comical. But it's their life we're out of this.
what kind of a mess?...What a mess
What do you mean by that?lady wrote:in my opinion think it different namely this exchangeable according to people[/u][/i]
What does that mean? What does truth mean to you? How do you know whether I always tell the truth or not? I guess it depends on what you understand by truth (=statements with which you agree).Rasheed wrote:Dixie
I respect your opinion, because I believe that you say the truth (maybe not always).
I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?Dixie wrote:What does that mean? What does truth mean to you? How do you know whether I always tell the truth or not? I guess it depends on what you understand by truth (=statements with which you agree).Rasheed wrote:Dixie
I respect your opinion, because I believe that you say the truth (maybe not always).
I don't understand you. You said you're neither homophobic nor you think they're different, yet you take pity on them and think they're on the wrong track. How can you have all that emotions when you see them as indifferent? They're not criminals, drug dealers, or anything like that. They just choose their mates in a different way than you do. If you think they're not different, how could they live a wrong life? If you're not homophobic, why would you take pity on them? What is the crime that they have done to the humanity? Please enlighten me. :?bambang wrote:Lennye, I am not homophobic. Just take pity on them. That's all.
That's the point!LennyeTran wrote: we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
We don't need any children. We don't need any generations. Thus, homosexsuality should be supported. Let's gayanize and lesbianize this world so that the population of this world will be decreasing pretty soon. I think this strategy is much more effective than the Chinese government's policy to limit the number of people by imposing a regulation for parents to have only one kid.Rasheed wrote: Then this behaviour "Homosexual",
is it a disease or normal situation?
Is it a rule or personal behavior (depend on acceptance of the two persons to do this)?
What's the purpose of marriage?
What's the futuristic results, if this behaviour become common?
We don't need children, right?
When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous.LennyeTran wrote: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
I'm sorry. I wasn't really trying to be funny. I was using my "satire" to speak out Rasheed's hypocrisy. He called people liars and don't know what the truth is while he is the one who wants to believe things based on what he sees. Because he sees that I've corrected him, he denies to see the truth in my words. What Dixie said wasn't new, for it was what I said in page 3. Did he see it? Of course, not. I'm glad Dixie didn't wanna discuss it further with him since it'd be a waste of time anyway. This is the reason why people called her smart.bambang wrote:When I stand next to you, you'll realize that I myself am the real poison. I am far more poisonous than you, my dear. My poison is dead poisonous.LennyeTran wrote: I'm the "poisonous" one, Dixie. Anyone who stands next to me is a saint, so you'd be like God if you were standing next to me. Ain't that the truth? Anyway, we see what we wanted to see, and it's the truth to us, isn't that right?
(mumbling... what a load of ~)Rasheed wrote: If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members,
Of course, we are scared. Did you even read your logic? It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, don't moan; only sluts do, be sexually available for your husband even when he's already had four wives, pray; only infidels don't pray, etc.Rasheed wrote: So they are scared of this discussion.
What a bunch of c***! Have you even attended school? How can you "reason" like that? And what does homosexuality have to do with incest?Rasheed wrote:
I don't know who refused the truth, that who search for her or who elude of it.
If they confirm the homosexual as a normal behavior, so they should be accept the sex relation between the family's members, Maybe they are, I don't know. then should to confess many illogical things.
So they are scared of this discussion.
It's not a big problem if they use the lie to prove their views.
Some of them use some reports have no scientific bases, they vilified the wikipedia before, but now it's great, and we can trust it and depend on it.
Anyway, the future will uncover the truth, but till this moment they have a half of world's problem, and they are the creators of second half of problems.
It's clear that the sun shined from the east but it'll die in the west.
Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't.
Ha ha ha... 100XLennyeTran wrote: ...It's a bunch of whack similar like keep your legs close during sex or you'll be a slut, ...
Yes, you are dead right.Hardi wrote:Technically can't sex between husband and wife, be also called sex between family members?
Adopt if you want kids and can't have one. Some straight people don't want kids. That's why we have a lot of orphans. Those kids have done nothing to deserve the neglect. What's the point of reproduction when one doesn't wanna take care of the result?bambang wrote:Well then, incest is still better that homosexuality?LennyeTran wrote: ...Incest gives you retarded kids; homosexuality doesn't.
I agree as incets gives kids. and the homos will never. :D :D :D
I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you.Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).
It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!
Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.
1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??
Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??
Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!
Lenny is the sex expert. Don't argue with her!LennyeTran wrote:I can assure that you know nothing about sex based on your post. Please don't embarrass yourself by saying that you know something about sex. You wouldn't have made those statements if you knew something about it. I would shut my mouth and learn more about sex if I were you.Moody wrote:Let’s analyze Gay Union (physical relation).
It consist of two parts
1- Emotional part that is LOVE which alone without physical part doesn’t fall in the category of Gay relation.
2- Physical part ONLY that defines if the relation is Gay or not. OR you can say that if two men are sexually involved ONLY THEN IT IS GAY REALTION.
So basically this relation is based on SEXUAL NATURE only!
Now lets analyze its MAIN ASPECT that is physical sexual relation.
1- From male satisfaction and sensation point, the best and natural a man get is from women. Question : Is it normal and hygienic or SICK behavior to get it by hitting a s.h.i.t hole??
2- And from the point view of person who is allowing the unnatural intercourse through his s.h.i.t hole. Question : Is in love he force the other to hit his s.h.i.t.? Is it normal or extremely unhygienic insane behavior??
Now the last question does love really demand such unhygienic and UNNATURAL behavior??
Are we so lost that don’t know countless other ways of showing our love and compassion like caring, helping and protecting each other rights etc? Rights doesn’t mean s.h.i.t bashing or adopting insane activities. Insanity is a DESEASE and not the normal course or nature of life. BAD HABITS ARE NOT NATURE, YOU ARE ONLY SO AROGANT NOT WILLING TO LEAVE THEM!!!!!!!!!